Complex Spousal Sponsorship: Navigating Challenges for Canada Immigration

Background: The sponsor, Sarah, is a Canadian citizen currently residing outside of Canada in Hong Kong due to work commitments. Sarah met her partner, Ying, on an online dating platform about two years ago. After getting to know each other online, they decided to meet in person and have been living together for approximately one year. While the couple shares a deep emotional bond, their relationship faces several legal, cultural, and logistical challenges, making their spousal sponsorship application for Canada immigration more complicated.

Challenges and Complexity:

1. Sponsor’s Residence: Sarah’s current residence outside of Canada in Hong Kong raises immediate concerns about her ability to sponsor Ying for permanent residency (PR) under Canada immigration rules. According to IRCC’s guidelines, a sponsor is typically required to live in Canada or demonstrate their intention to live in Canada with their spouse once the sponsorship is approved. While Sarah plans to return to Canada eventually, her long-term stay in Hong Kong complicates matters. She may need to provide additional documentation to confirm her intentions, such as job offers in Canada or plans to sell her assets in Hong Kong. If Sarah plans to remain in Hong Kong indefinitely or for an extended period, this could jeopardize Ying’s eligibility for Canada PR under the spousal sponsorship category.
   
   

2. Common-Law Relationship in a Non-Legal Jurisdiction: The couple resides in Hong Kong, where common-law relationships are not legally recognized. This lack of legal acknowledgment presents a significant challenge in proving the authenticity of their relationship for immigration Canada purposes. In most jurisdictions that recognize common-law unions, couples can submit joint financial documents (such as bank accounts, leases, or utility bills) as evidence. However, since Sarah and Ying cannot establish such joint records, they need to rely on alternative proofs of their shared life. Hong Kong immigration to Canada authorities might question the legitimacy of their relationship, especially since Hong Kong does not have a formalized process for recognizing such partnerships.

   Some alternative evidence they may submit includes:
   
   - Affidavits from friends and family: Statements from individuals who can verify their relationship, outlining how long they have known the couple and describing their living arrangements, social life, and commitment.
   
   - Joint travel itineraries: Flight tickets, hotel reservations, and travel plans for vacations taken together, proving they have spent significant time together outside of their home environment.
   
   - Social media and communication records: Extensive communication logs from messaging apps, emails, and video calls, showing ongoing communication and the development of their relationship over time.
   
   

3. Previous Marriage and Divorce of Ying: Ying was previously married but divorced several years ago. While divorce is not inherently problematic for Canada immigration, it raises potential concerns for immigration Canada regarding the genuineness of the relationship. There is a possibility that Ying’s previous marriage could be scrutinized, with questions about whether the divorce was truly final, whether it was contested, and whether the divorce was for any reason that might impact the credibility of Ying’s current relationship with Sarah.
   
   Ying will need to provide the following documentation to demonstrate that their divorce was legally finalized:
   
   - Divorce decree and final judgment: Proof that the previous marriage was legally dissolved.
   
   - Background check: Evidence that Ying does not have any unresolved legal or financial obligations from the previous marriage that could complicate the sponsorship.
   
   - Explanation letter from Ying: A personal letter explaining the reasons for the divorce, how long the marriage lasted, and why it ended. This letter should also confirm that Ying is not legally or financially bound to the previous partner and is genuinely committed to building a future with Sarah.
   
   

4. Cultural Differences: Sarah and Ying come from distinct cultural backgrounds, which presents another layer of complexity. Sarah is from Canada, while Ying is from mainland China. They both understand and respect each other's cultures, but their differing cultural norms may be perceived by IRCC as potentially problematic in terms of the relationship's authenticity. In many Canada visa cases, the immigration authorities may question whether cultural misunderstandings, family pressures, or expectations are influencing the relationship in a way that affects its genuineness.
   
   To address potential concerns, Sarah and Ying could take the following steps:
   
   - Detailed explanation in their relationship history: They may write a detailed letter explaining how they navigate their cultural differences, how they resolve conflicts, and their future plans together.
   
   - Photos with extended family members: Evidence of both sides of the family meeting or spending time together could strengthen the argument that their relationship is accepted by their families despite cultural differences.
   
   - Shared cultural activities or traditions: Highlighting how they have blended or respected each other’s cultures, whether through shared meals, traditions, or celebrations, can demonstrate their genuine commitment and understanding.
   
   

5. Proof of Relationship and Cohabitation: Given the difficulty in establishing joint financial records due to Hong Kong’s lack of recognition for common-law relationships, Sarah and Ying will need to provide alternative documentation to demonstrate their ongoing cohabitation. These may include:
   
   - Witness statements: Letters from landlords, neighbors, or people in their social circle who can confirm they live together and have maintained a consistent, long-term relationship.
   
   - Photos and timelines: A visual timeline of their time together, including photos from significant milestones, such as family gatherings, holidays, or anniversaries.
   
   - Legal documents in lieu of joint accounts: While they can’t provide bank statements in both names, they may submit documents that show they have shared responsibilities in other ways, such as receipts for joint purchases or correspondence with service providers indicating joint arrangements.
   
   - Emails or letters from their employer: If either of them has made adjustments to their work schedule to accommodate shared time, evidence of employer correspondence might be useful.
   
   

6. The Relationship’s Short Duration: While the couple has been together for over a year, this may be seen as a relatively short time for an immigration Canada spousal sponsorship application. IRCC may question the depth of the relationship, particularly since the couple is from different cultural backgrounds and has a non-traditional living arrangement. However, given that they’ve lived together in Hong Kong for a substantial period, the couple could argue that they have demonstrated a commitment beyond typical dating and are preparing for a long-term future.
   
   Evidence to strengthen their case:
   
   - Long-term plans: The couple should outline their future goals, such as plans for marriage, children, or career changes that would solidify their long-term commitment.
   
   - Joint plans to settle in Canada: Evidence of their intention to establish a life together in Canada, such as job searches, property searches, or educational plans for Ying in Canada.

What Can Be Done to Strengthen the Application:

• Strong relationship documentation: Given the difficulties in proving a common-law relationship in Hong Kong, Sarah and Ying will need to present as much evidence as possible to demonstrate their commitment, love, and shared life.

• Proof of sponsor’s intent to return to Canada: Sarah should provide evidence of her plans to return to Canada, such as job offers, housing plans, or letters from family members supporting her return.

• Legal and cultural context explanation: The couple should include a thorough explanation of their cultural differences, how they’ve navigated them, and the importance of their relationship in both their lives.

• Marriage intent: If applicable, Sarah and Ying could consider formalizing their relationship through a civil marriage in Hong Kong or elsewhere, as this could strengthen the application by making their relationship more legally recognized.

---

Do I need to hire an immigration consultant if I apply for permanent residence?

You’re not required to hire an immigration consultant to apply for permanent residence, but having one can offer some key benefits.

Whether you complete and submit the application on your own or with help from an immigration professional, your chances of success remain the same—assuming the application is equally strong.

That said, an experienced and trustworthy Canadian immigration consultant can assist you in creating the strongest possible permanent residence (PR) application. They can also offer strategic advice to help you navigate the immigration journey with ease.

A qualified immigration consultant can also:

• Recommend the most suitable immigration program within the immigration system;

• Assist in gathering and organizing the necessary documents and information for a solid PR application;

• Make sure your application is accurate and avoids errors or misrepresentation; and

• Help address any unexpected issues that may come up during the process.

Ultimately, the real value in hiring an immigration consultant lies not in having them fill out forms, but in the tailored guidance and expertise they provide throughout your immigration journey.